nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 05, v.42 16-25
基于灰关联法的新疆额敏县布尔阔台河下游泥石流危险性评价
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发青年科学家项目(2022YFC3080200)
邮箱(Email): zhang_wen@jlu.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.05.003
摘要:

新疆额敏县布尔阔台河下游沿岸发育多条沟谷型泥石流,但受限于区域气候较干旱与人类活动较少,泥石流灾害研究基础薄弱,相关地质数据匮乏,物源识别和危险性定量分析存在较大困难。传统二维遥感方法难以满足复杂地形下的物源识别精度需求,成为制约区域灾害评估精度的技术瓶颈。通过野外调查、卫星遥感解译与无人机倾斜摄影等手段,获取了研究区16条泥石流沟(Z01~Z09、Y01~Y07)的精细地质信息,结合无人机构建的高精度三维实景模型,开展了物源类型划分与储量估算;进一步选取15个泥石流特征因子,判定各沟易发性等级,并引入灰关联法,结合10个危险性评价指标(含2个主要因子与8个次要因子),量化评估各泥石流沟的危险度。结果表明,区域内沟谷普遍具备孕灾地貌与物源条件,其中14条沟为中等易发,2条沟为轻度易发;但总体危险度均属于轻度等级。本研究创新性地提出了“无人机三维建模+灰关联评价”融合技术路径,为半干旱区沟谷型泥石流的快速识别与科学评估提供了新方法。

Abstract:

A number of valley-type debris flow gullies have developed along the lower reaches of the Buerkuotai River in Emin County, Xinjiang. However, due to the region's semiarid climate and limited human activity, data scarcity and weak debris flow development pose challenges to risk evaluation. In particular, conventional 2D remote sensing methods are insufficient for accurately identifying source materials in complex terrains. Through field investigation, satellite image interpretation, and unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) oblique photography the fine geological information of 16 debris flow gullies(Z01~Z09 and Y01~Y07)in the study area was obtained. Combined with the high-precision 3D real-lifemodel constructed by UAV, the classification of provenance types and reservesestimation were carried out, and 15 debris flow indicators were selected to assess susceptibility levels, and ten risk assessment factors(including two primary and eight secondary factors) were used in a grey correlation-based evaluation model. Results indicate that 14 gullies are moderately susceptible and two are mildly susceptible, with all classified as mildly dangerous overall. This study proposes an innovative methodology that combines UAV-based 3D modeling and grey correlation analysis, offering a novel approach for rapid debris flow assessment in semiarid mountainous regions.

参考文献

[1]邵玉祥,计扬,严步青,等.四川攀枝花仁和区大箐沟泥石流调查及危险性评价[J].农业灾害研究,2021,11(5):145-150.

[2]毛佳睿,李铁锋,田运涛,等.基于物源特征的白龙江流域泥石流易发性评价[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(28):11479-11490.

[3]王凤娘,贺拿,陈容,等.九寨沟县西番沟泥石流调查[J].山地学报,2019,37(4):622-630.

[4]陈志,杨志全,刘传秋.云南省麻栗坡县猛硐河“9.02”泥石流调查[J].山地学报,2019,37(4):631-638.

[5] Kumar A, Sarkar R. Debris flow susceptibility evaluation:a review[J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology,Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2023, 47(3):1277-1292.

[6]陈超.九寨沟县震后潜在泥石流危险性评价研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2019.

[7]李俊,陈宁生,赵苑迪.基于三参数Weibull分布的粘性泥石流一次总量计算模型[J].四川理工学院学报(自然科学版),2018,31(3):60-67.

[8]徐艳琴.基于降雨指标量化的攀西泥石流危险性评价[D].南京:南京信息工程大学,2018.

[9]韩用顺,王晶,吴淼,等.汶川县震后潜在泥石流危险性评价研究[J].工程科学与技术,2018,50(3):158-168.

[10]方群生,唐川,王毅,等.汶川极震区泥石流动储量与总物源量计算方法研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2016,36(6):1008-1014.

[11]顾文韬,裴向军,裴钻,等.极震区震后泥石流物源特征研究[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(2):107-114.

[12]宋志,巴仁基,刘宇杰.四川康定母猪笼沟泥石流形成特征与物源定量计算[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2012,23(3):39-45.

[13]殷跃平,高少华.高位远程地质灾害研究:回顾与展望[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2024,35(1):1-18.

[14]殷跃平.地质灾害风险调查评价方法与应用实践[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(4):5-6.

[15]殷跃平.全球地质学复兴:我们正进入“人类纪”——第32届国际地质大会环境地质述评[J].地质通报,2005(2):99-103.

[16]王琼.基于流域尺度的震后汶川县潜在泥石流危险性评价[D].成都:成都理工大学,2012.

[17]铁永波.强震区城镇泥石流灾害风险评价方法与体系研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2009.

[18]中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会.泥石流灾害防治工程勘查规范(试行):T/CAGHP006-2018[S].北京:中国地质大学出版社,2018.

[19]刘希林,莫多闻.泥石流风险及沟谷泥石流风险度评价[J].工程地质学报,2002,10(3):266-273.

[20]陈循谦,朱平一.《云南小江流域泥石流综合考察与防治规划》通过鉴定[J].山地研究,1987,5(1):61-62.

[21]陈荟竹,刘希林,邱锦安.基于CiteSpace的近三十年中国泥石流灾害风险研究综合分析[J].工程地质学报,2018,26(2):286-295.

[22]刘希林,庙成,田春山.区域滑坡和泥石流灾害两种危险性评价方法的比较分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2017,37(1):71-78.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.05.003

中图分类号:P642.23

引用信息:

[1]王永胜,毛成文,张文,等.基于灰关联法的新疆额敏县布尔阔台河下游泥石流危险性评价[J].吉林建筑大学学报,2025,42(05):16-25.DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.05.003.

基金信息:

国家重点研发青年科学家项目(2022YFC3080200)

发布时间:

2025-10-15

出版时间:

2025-10-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文