| 1 | 0 | 21 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对氩氧脱碳工艺产生的不锈钢渣(Argon oxygen decarburization,简称AOD渣)活性低、易磨性差、利用率低等问题,通过物理激发(调控粉磨时间与助磨剂)与化学激发(添加激发剂),系统探究其对AOD渣活性指数、粒度分布及比表面积的影响,并基于改性AOD渣制备固废低碳胶凝材料。试验表明,AOD渣粉磨15 min时,其45μm筛余量降至5.4%,比表面积达482 m2/kg;助磨剂掺量为0.06%时,其筛余量进一步降至3.52%,比表面积升至524 m2/kg。当胶凝材料按AOD渣20%、矿渣48.5%、石膏16%、CS-1型激发剂15.5%配比时,砂浆试块标准养护28 d后,其抗折强度为6.5 MPa、抗压强度为46.6 MPa,较对照组K0分别提升52.3%、49.8%。通过SEM分析可知,砂浆微观结构更致密,水化产物C—S—H凝胶与AFt搭接紧密,为强度提升提供支撑。
Abstract:Addressing the issues of low activity,poor grindability,and low utilization rate of stainless steel slag(Argon oxygen decarburization,abbreviated as AOD slag) produced by the argon-oxygen decarburization process,systematically investigated the effects of physical excitation (regulating grinding time and grinding aids) and chemical excitation (adding activators) on the activity index,particle size distribution,and specific surface area of AOD slag.Based on the modified AOD slag,a low-carbon cementitious material for solid waste is prepared.Experiments show that when the AOD slag is ground for 15 minutes,its 45μm sieve residue decreases to 5.4%,and its specific surface area reaches 482 m2/kg;when the grinding aid content is 0.06%,the sieve residue further decreases to 3.52%,and the specific surface area increases to 524 m2/kg.When the cementitious material is prepared with a ratio of 20%AOD slag,48.5% slag,16%gypsum,and 15.5% CS-1 activator,after standard curing for 28 days,the flexural strength is 6.5 MPa and the compressive strength is 46.6 MPa,which are 52.3% and 49.8%higher than those of the control group K0,respectively.SEM analysis reveals that the microstructure of the mortar is denser,with hydration products C—S—H gel and AFt closely overlapping,providing support for the strength improvement.
[1]邵立志.不锈钢渣处理现状及未来展望[J].铸造技术,2021, 42(3):234-238.
[2]吴春丽,陈哲,谢红波,等.不锈钢渣的资源处置研究进展[J].材料导报, 2021, 35(增刊1):462-466.
[3]李小明,李文锋,王尚杰,等.不锈钢渣资源化研究现状[J].湿法冶金,2012,31(1):5-8.
[4]吴春丽,谢红波,陈哲,等.不锈钢渣理化性质分析与应用研究[J].硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(4):1225-1230.
[5]吕岩,林路,梁强,等.不锈钢渣胶凝活性分析及其物理活化试验研究[J].河北冶金, 2020(8):17-23.
[6]张华,傅大宝,王本俊,等.不锈钢渣掺量对碱矿渣-不锈钢渣砂浆抗裂性能的影响[J].河北工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 40(2):71-76.
[7]倪亚峰,黄小青,董健苗,等.复掺不锈钢渣尾泥-矿渣对水泥水化性能的影响[J].科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(16):6857-6862.
[8]南雪丽,王佳亮,王超杰,等.不同化学激发剂对钢渣水硬活性的影响[J].兰州理工大学学报, 2018, 44(1):138-142.
[9]倪亚峰,黄小青.不锈钢渣在水泥混凝土中应用进展[J].建材发展导向, 2019, 17(20):23-25.
[10]张涛,陈铁军,陈永亮,等.机械活化和不锈钢渣掺量对矿渣胶凝材料性能的影响[J].硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2):553-561.
[11]Qiao B, Ullah K, Wu Z X, et al. Mechanism and property optimization of stainless steel slag for preparation of cementitious materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 411:134645.
[12]刘益良,张恃豪,张林,等.钢渣活性激发方法及机械活化试验研究[J].北华航天工业学院学报, 2025, 35(1):17-20.
[13]史永林.不锈钢渣和矿渣制备胶凝材料的试验研究[J].新型建筑材料, 2012, 39(10):14-16.
[14]Hao X S, Liu X M, Zhang Z Q, et al. In-depth insight into the cementitious synergistic effect of steel slag and red mud on the properties of composite cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 52:104449.
[15]周敏,刘家明,李广慧,等.不同添加剂对精炼不锈钢渣粉磨性能和活性指数的影响[J].粉煤灰综合利用,2019, 33(1):46-49.
[16]吴春丽,陈哲,谢红波,等.不锈钢渣复合胶凝材料水化过程及性能研究[J].广东建材, 2020, 36(11):4-8, 54.
[17]Rosales J, Cabrera M, Agrela F. Effect of stainless steel slag waste as a replacement for cement in mortars.Mechanical and statistical study[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 142:444-458.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2026.02.005
中图分类号:X757;TU526
引用信息:
[1]丁锐,盛玉,安雪艳,等.不锈钢渣活性与固废胶凝材料制备及性能研究[J].吉林建筑大学学报,2026,43(02):35-42.DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2026.02.005.
基金信息:
吉林省科技厅重点研发项目(20250203184SF)
2026-04-15
2026-04-15