nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 01, v.42 60-67
地基不均匀沉降下加筋土路基力学行为模型试验
基金项目(Foundation): 四川省交通运输科技项目(2020-A-01); 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科研课题(KYY2018110(18-19))
邮箱(Email): xiaoshiguo@swjtu.cn;
DOI: 10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.01.008
摘要:

研究地基不均匀沉降对加筋土路基力学行为的影响,对于合理认识路基正常服役性能具有重要意义。依托孟加拉国某软土地区铁路对拉反包式加筋土路基工程,进行了缩尺比为1∶2的室内大比例静力物理模型试验,以地基不均匀沉降为基本条件,包括不涉水工况、路堤顶面堆载且涉水工况、不堆载而涉水工况等3种试验工况,测得了相应的加筋土路基的位移与应力变化特征。结果表明:面板侧向位移随地基沉降而增大,地基不均匀沉降可导致面板最大侧向位移增幅为10%,也使路堤顶面及路堤内部沉降呈非线性增大;地基沉降可使路堤底部竖向压应力最大增幅达30%,使反包端后侧土压力沿深度呈重心偏下的抛物线分布,且对路堤中上部反包端土压力影响相对显著;地基沉降增大了土工格栅轴向拉力,最下层拉筋轴力的平均增幅为30%~50%,由下而上对拉筋轴力影响逐渐呈非线性降低。

Abstract:

It is important to study the influence of uneven foundation settlement on the mechanical behavior of reinforced embankment to reasonably understand its serviceability. Based on an end-wrapped geogrid-reinforced railway embankment on soft ground in Bangladesh, a large-scale laboratory static model test with a scale ratio of 1∶ 2 was carried out. Under the basic condition of the uneven settlement, three test cases were conducted including no water condition, embankment top loading with water action, and water action without the loading.The displacement and stress characteristics of the reinforced embankment were measured. The results show that the lateral displacement of the panel increases with the foundation settlement. The uneven settlement of the foundation causes the maximum lateral displacement of the panel to increase by 10% and the settlement of the top and interior of the embankment to increase nonlinearly. The uneven settlement can increase vertical compressive stress at the embankment bottom by 30% and make the earth pressure at the back of the wrapped end exhibit a parabolic distribution along the depth. The influence on the lateral earth pressure at the middle and upper embankment is relatively significant. The settlement increases the axial tension of the geogrids, with the average increase of the axial force at the lowest reinforcement is 30% to 50%. The influence on the axial force of the reinforcements gradually decreases from the bottom to the top.

参考文献

[1]褚夫蛟,刘敦文,侯志勇,等.高速公路复工路基土工格栅的加固补强稳定性[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2016, 37(5):741-745.

[2]观祖保,杨挺,吴巨贵,等.土工格栅处治老路拼接的加筋效应分析[J].中国公路学报, 2017, 30(6):215-222.

[3]刘金龙,栾茂田,王吉利,等.土工织物加固软土路基的机理分析[J].岩土力学, 2007, 28(5):1009-1014.

[4]汪益敏,闫岑,于恒,等.静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2018, 39(S1):311-317.

[5] Bathurst R,陶连金.加筋边坡在坡顶荷载作用下的极限承载能力[J].岩土工程学报, 2004, 27(2):194-197.

[6]羊晔,刘松玉,邓永锋.加筋路基处治不均匀沉降模型试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2009, 30(3):703-706.

[7]郭小川,刘德富,肖衡林.新型土工格栅加筋土路堤模型试验研究[J].湖北工业大学学报, 2014, 29(2):5-9.

[8]杜运兴,刘新军,尚守平,等.预应力CFRP加筋粘土路堤模型试验研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,34(7):6-10.

[9] Demir A, Yildiz A, Laman M, et al. Experimental and numerical analyses of circular footing on geogridreinforced granular fill underlain by soft clay[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2014, 9(4):711-723.

[10]陈仁朋,汪焱卫,陈金苗.桩网结构路基格栅加筋作用及其拉力特性研究[J].西南交通大学学报, 2016, 51(6):1080-1086.

[11]刘春,赵洪波,白世伟.土工格栅在治理软土路基沉降问题中的研究[J].岩土力学, 2003(6):1070-1073.

[12]陈福全,赖丰文,李大勇.受空洞坍塌影响的加筋路基研究综述[J].岩土力学, 2018, 39(9):3362-3376.

[13] Bridle R J, Enner C G. Polymer geogrids for bridging mining voids[J]. Geosynthetics International, 1997, 4(1):33-50.

[14] Briancon L, Villard P. Design of geosynthetic-reinforced platforms spanning localized sinkholes[J]. Geotextiles&Geomembranes, 2008, 26(5):416-428.

[15]刘晓明,吴从义,黎莉.塌陷区水平加筋处治方法及其变形特性研究[J].中外公路, 2016, 36(4):37-41.

[16]贺炜,李昆,王芳洪.防岩溶塌陷加筋垫层大比例模型试验及设计理论研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2016,35(5):980-988.

[17]王志杰,高古顺,杨广庆,等.塌陷区上覆加筋路基力学行为演化与变形机理细观研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 55(4):1523-1536.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.01.008

中图分类号:U213.1

引用信息:

[1]肖世国,李绍红,闫清卫等.地基不均匀沉降下加筋土路基力学行为模型试验[J].吉林建筑大学学报,2025,42(01):60-67.DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.01.008.

基金信息:

四川省交通运输科技项目(2020-A-01); 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科研课题(KYY2018110(18-19))

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文