22 | 0 | 26 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
建筑的抗震性能与结构形式息息相关,研究异形柱框架对复合墙板的抗震性能影响十分必要。本课题提出一种城镇建筑适用的装配式复合墙板,采用湿连接形成整体框架,其外边框与现浇构造柱、叠合梁共同形成装配整体式异形柱框架结构体系:设计并制作了无异形柱和有T形异形柱的两块复合墙板1∶2缩尺模型,通过拟静力试验,研究其破坏机理和抗震性能。研究表明:两块墙板皆呈剪切破坏,但其破坏原因不同,无异形柱框架的复合墙板因外边框柱脚严重破坏而结束试验,带T形异形柱框架的复合墙板则因异形柱框架无法继续工作而结束试验;带T形异形柱框架的复合墙板耗能能力要优于无异形柱框架的复合墙板,其承载力和变形能力也更优。
Abstract:The seismic performance of the building is closely related to the structural form, so it is necessary to study the effect of shaped column frame on the seismic performance of composite wall panels. This topic proposes an assembled composite wall panel applicable to urban buildings, which adopts wet connection to form an integral frame, and its outer frame together with cast-in-place structural columns and stacked beams form an assembled integral shaped-column frame structural system. Two composite wall panels without shaped columns and with T-shaped shaped columns are designed and fabricated as 1∶ 2 scaled models, and their damage mechanisms and seismic performance are investigated through proposed static tests. The study shows that both wall panels are damaged in shear, but the causes of damage are different: the composite wall panel without shaped column frame ends the test due to the serious damage of the outer frame footing, while the composite wall panel with T-shaped shaped column frame ends the test due to the inability of the shaped column frame to continue to work; the energy consumption capacity of the composite wall panel with T-shape shaped column frame is better than that of the composite wall panel without shaped column frame, and its load carrying capacity and deformation capacity are better as well.
[1]何泉,石翠莹,黄炜.低能耗装配式建筑外墙设计研究综述[J].建筑节能(中英文), 2023, 51(3):30-36.
[2]高志杰,郭振雷,张佳阳,等.我国装配式混凝土剪力墙结构体系发展综述[J].混凝土与水泥制品, 2023(9):69-74.
[3]史靖塬,倪新.国内装配式剪力墙结构体系分析研究[J].建筑结构, 2022, 52(S1):1823-1828.
[4]宋晓刚,翟淑凡,王媛媛.“双碳”目标下建筑工程全生命周期低碳发展对策研究[J].建筑经济, 2023, 44(3):11-17.
[5]孙鸿敏,侯兆新,尚仁杰,等. ALC岩棉保温一体化复合墙板应用研究[J].工业建筑, 2023, 53(S1):661-668, 628.
[6] Li T,Jia G,Hu S Y, et al. Research on the design of the integrated wall panel of the prefabricated building in substations[J]. Journal of Physics:Conference Series,2021, 1904(1):012026.
[7]张倩.建筑工程建设中的混凝土装配式住宅施工工艺[J].四川建材, 2024, 50(4):181-183.
[8]赵全斌,张凌宇,苗纪奎.蒸压加气混凝土外墙板连接节点的研究进展[J].新型建筑材料, 2023, 50(4):116-123.
[9]范青玉,孙瑞武,吕悦.装配式建筑的技术经济分析[J].工业建筑, 2023, 53(S1):815-817, 840.
[10]赵娟,焦丽明.装配式建筑产业发展现状及对策[J].建筑科学, 2024, 40(6):116-122.
[11]王大伟,张书航,金明昌,等.轻质混凝土外挂墙板设计方法及试验研究[J].建筑结构, 2022, 52(S2):1422-1429.
[12]谢群,周代昱,于周健,等.装配式喷射混凝土夹芯墙板抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构, 2023, 53(14):33-39.
[13]张东升,董锦坤,王静.钢筋混凝土框架夹心节点的抗震性能分析[J].辽宁工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021,41(2):132-134.
[14]杨超,徐亚冲,欧进萍.模块化装配式钢框架组合柱及其抗侧与抗震滞回性能[J].工程力学, 2022, 39(4):65-75.
[15]杨丹.混凝土模块化堆叠框架结构梁柱节点抗震性能试验研究[D].合肥:安徽建筑大学, 2024.
[16]张智勇.模块化混凝土结构剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[D].合肥:安徽建筑大学, 2023.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.01.006
中图分类号:TU352.11
引用信息:
[1]钱坤,姜颖杰,秦永鹏等.异形柱框架对装配式复合墙板的抗震性能影响分析[J].吉林建筑大学学报,2025,42(01):44-50.DOI:10.20203/j.cnki.2095-8919.2025.01.006.
基金信息:
吉林省科技厅项目(20190303123SF)